-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
INTPYTHON-624 Add PolymorphicEmbeddedModelField #327
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
if transform: | ||
return transform | ||
field = None | ||
for model in self.embedded_models: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if multiple submodes has the same field name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I called this out in the design doc. I think we'll have to use the system check framework to enforce that common field names at least use the same type, otherwise, we won't know how to prepare the lookup value (e.g. the DatabaseOperations.adapt_<field>_value()
methods).
Thinking about it some more, there is also the possibility that nested embedded documents share a field name. In that case, we won't know which field to traverse for the nested lookups that follow.
@@ -121,8 +121,10 @@ def _isnull_operator(a, b): | |||
"gte": lambda a, b: {"$gte": [a, b]}, | |||
# MongoDB considers null less than zero. Exclude null values to match | |||
# SQL behavior. | |||
"lt": lambda a, b: {"$and": [{"$lt": [a, b]}, {"$ne": [a, None]}]}, | |||
"lte": lambda a, b: {"$and": [{"$lte": [a, b]}, {"$ne": [a, None]}]}, | |||
"lt": lambda a, b: {"$and": [{"$lt": [a, b]}, DatabaseWrapper._isnull_operator(a, False)]}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This introduces a regression in model_fields_.test_embedded_model_array.QueryingTests.test_array_as_rhs_for_arrayfield_lookups) (lookup='lt')
:
pymongo.errors.OperationFailure: Expression $type takes exactly 1 arguments. 2 were passed in., full error: {'ok': 0.0, 'errmsg': 'Expression $type takes exactly 1 arguments. 2 were passed in.', 'code': 16020, 'codeName': 'Location16020'}
Probably an array literal is treated as a multi-argument value in "$eq": [{"$type": a}, "missing"]},
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it seems, If I don't remember wrong, the Value(value)
is transformed in {"$literal": value}
. So the $eq
should work. I have to debug this particular case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, the literal
literally fixes the issue.
In django_mongodb_backend/expressions.py
, make the following change:
--- a/django_mongodb_backend/expressions.py
+++ b/django_mongodb_backend/expressions.py
@@ def value(self, compiler, connection): # noqa: ARG001
value = self.value
- if isinstance(value, int):
- # Wrap numbers in $literal to prevent ambiguity when Value appears in
+ if isinstance(value, int | list):
+ # Wrap numbers and list in $literal to prevent ambiguity when Value appears in
# $project.
return {"$literal": value}
) | ||
field_name = field.name | ||
if existing_field := embedded_fields.get(field.name): | ||
connection = _get_mongodb_connection() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check should run anytime? or only when a migration is applied on the database? 🤔
Given that make migrations does not pass the database, because it should be agnostic to that but when a migration is applied it should not be agnostic. So when do we want to check this? when a migration is created, or anytime?
Edit: change the way that field types are compared is viable?
No description provided.